In history class I debated a peer of mine on the topic of immigration. I was given the side that argued that illegal immigrants should not be given full time residence in the US. I argued that if illegal immigrants were given this right of permanent residence, this will open the floodgates for more and more people to come to our nation illegally, that we will be rewarding those who break the law, and we will be making it easier to allow people who are not contributing to society to live in out nation.
According to two peers I lost (32-34 and 36-35). According to David I tied 36-36.
I could have asked better questions and been more confident in my use of facts.
The essay was hard to right because it took a lot of research to come up with good facts that back to back up my thesis. If I had to choose I would say that everyone who is already here should be able to have permanent residence. However, in order to prevent the floodgate to open we have to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tkIdCHtPrs
According to two peers I lost (32-34 and 36-35). According to David I tied 36-36.
I could have asked better questions and been more confident in my use of facts.
The essay was hard to right because it took a lot of research to come up with good facts that back to back up my thesis. If I had to choose I would say that everyone who is already here should be able to have permanent residence. However, in order to prevent the floodgate to open we have to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tkIdCHtPrs
No comments:
Post a Comment